Critics give Do You Want More?!!!??! a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 95.
The verdict on Do You Want More?!!!??!
6 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 95 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 70 The Rolling Stone Album Guide and NME
- Career #6 of The Roots's 10 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Tracy E. Hopkins | A | 95 | 1995 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Tarisai Ngangura | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2021 | |
| The Source via Wikipediaby Brett Johnson | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Charles Aaron | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby John Bush | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3/4 | 75 | 2006 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Tom Moon | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| NME via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2006 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Do You Want More?!!!??! in The Roots's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Roots
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on The Roots's other albums (8).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide Harsher than usual11 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on The Roots's other albums (3).
- Entertainment Weekly Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on The Roots's other albums (7).
- Spin About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on The Roots's other albums (8).
- AllMusic About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on The Roots's other albums (9).
More from The Roots
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 1994
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply