Things Fall Apart

The Roots – Things Fall Apart: B-Side Breakdown 86 (B) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Things Fall Apart by The Roots
Released February 22, 1999
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Roots

Things Fall Apart

86
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 8 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown86Grade: B
Approval100%8 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of The Roots's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Phrenology (84). The second best-reviewed album of 1999 we've tracked.

020406080100Q: 80Rolling Stone: 80NME: 80Alternative Press: 80Entertainment Weekly: 85Robert Christgau: 88Pitchfork: 94AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 86
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 9.4/10 94 2016 “Things Fall Apart was a turning point for the Roots, the record where they figured out what kind of band they could be. Both its themes and its eclectic mix…”
Robert Christgau via Wikipedia B+ 88
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B 85
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005

More from The Roots

See all The Roots albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 1999

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply