Critics give Anthems for Doomed Youth a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 80.
The verdict on Anthems for Doomed Youth
4 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 Uncut, Mojo and The Guardian
- Lowest 60 Spin, Q and The Independent
- By the numbers The lowest score of The Libertines's 4 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Gavin Martin | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Pat Gilbert | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “It has its flaws, but the first new album from the re-formed Libertines is better than anyone might reasonably have hoped” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2015 | “A third Libertines album once seemed about as likely as a fifth Smiths LP. Like recovery, Anthems for Doomed Youth takes things one step at a time. It's an absorbing…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Anthems for Doomed Youth on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “For reunited bands, opting to make new albums instead of just milking the enormo-gig cash cow is something of risk – make something that doesn’t match up to your peak…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Spin via Wikipediaby Alfred Soto | 6/10 | 60 | 2015 | “6SPIN Rating: 6 of 10Release Date: September 11, 2015Label: Harvest / Virgin EMINow that Carl Barât and Pete Doherty have proven they are capable of” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2015 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Kevin Harley | 3/5 | 60 | 2015 | “Download: Gunga Din, Fury of Chonburi, Glasgow Coma Scale Blues” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from The Libertines
← Earlier The Libertines (2004)Later → All Quiet on the Eastern Esplanade (2024)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply