Liar

The Jesus Lizard – Liar: B-Side Breakdown 85 (B) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Liar by The Jesus Lizard
Released September 16, 1992
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Jesus Lizard

Liar

85
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 7 critics · 71% approval
B-Side Breakdown85Grade: B
Approval71%5 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Liar an early B-Side Breakdown of 85 (B), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of The Jesus Lizard's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Goat (78). Scores ran from 60 (Q) to 100 (Select).

020406080100Q: 60NME: 70Paste: 80AllMusic: 90Pitchfork: 92Select: 100Chicago Tribune: 100 Breakdown 85
The gist
Select via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry 5/5 100 2006
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot 4/4 100 1992 “Jesus Lizard Liar (Touch & Go) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR)(STAR) Angular and angry, a blend of virtuoso musicianship and cathartic singing, ”Liar” will sound too ”out there” for most alternative-rock wanna-bes, even as…”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jason Crock 9.2/10 92 2009 “The first four full-lengths from the hugely influential noise-rock band have been remastered by Steve Albini and Bob Weston and reissued.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming 4.5/5 90
Paste via Wikipediaby Austin L. Ray 80/100 80 2009 “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.”
NME via Wikipediaby Edwin Pouncey 7/10 70 2006
Q via Wikipediaby Charlie Dick 3/5 60 2006

More from The Jesus Lizard

See all The Jesus Lizard albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1992

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply