Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 48 to 100.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Halsey's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Manic (79). Scores ran from 48 (Pitchfork) to 100 (NME).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Kristen S. Hé | 5/5 | 100 | 2024 | “On the surface, the ever-evolving artist’s fifth album is an homage to the musicians who have helped shape them. Dig deeper, though, and you’ll find a her grappling with her…” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Rachel R. Carroll | 9/10 | 90 | 2024 | “Halsey's The Great Impersonator reimagines her career throughout the decades, displaying a conceptual artist at the top of her game. A masterclass in honesty.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Caitlin Chatterton | 9/10 | 90 | 2024 | “Throughout their career, Halsey has been lots of different things to different people. She was the blue-haired 19-year-old singing about her Brooklyn” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Halsey's The Great Impersonator' Review” |
| Dork via Wikipediaby Neive McCarthy | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “The Great Impersonator by Halsey · released 25th October 2024 · via Columbia · 19 tracks · album profile · plus 19 related Dork coverage items.” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Emma Wilkes | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Halsey experiments and shapeshifts as she tells her most personal story yet on epic fifth album, The Great Impersonator” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2024 | “The singer proves to be a less than great impersonator…and that’s mostly a good thing.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Shaad D’Souza | 4.8/10 | 48 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Halsey
More Pop from around 2024
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply