Instant Holograms on Metal Film

Stereolab – Instant Holograms on Metal Film: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 12 critic reviews.

Album cover for Instant Holograms on Metal Film by Stereolab
Released May 23, 2025
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Stereolab

Instant Holograms on Metal Film

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 12 critics · 83% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval83%10 of 12 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Critics give Instant Holograms on Metal Film a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 12 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

The verdict on Instant Holograms on Metal Film

10 of 12 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

020406080100Northern Transmissions: 60The Needle Drop: 70Pitchfork: 78The Line of Best Fit: 80Mojo: 80The Guardian: 80The Arts Desk: 80Exclaim!: 80Under the Radar: 90Uncut: 90musicOMH: 90AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 81
The gist
Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Scotty Dransfield 9/10 90 “On Instant Holograms on Metal Film, Stereolab return not just with new music, but with renewed purpose.”
Uncut via Wikipediaby Sam Richards 4.5/5 90 May 22, 2025
musicOMH via Wikipediaby Steven Johnson 4.5/5 90 May 22, 2025 “One of alternative music’s most beloved outfits return with their first album in 15 years, sounding as elegant, refined and exploratory as ever”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4.5/5 90
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Samuel Cox 8/10 80 May 22, 2025 “While many of Stereolab’s signature moves are on display on Instant Holograms on Metal Film, these arrangement choices never feel gratuitous or as if the band are merely playing to…”
Mojo via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal 4/5 80 May 14, 2025 “Extra dimensions: Experimental retro futurists still dazzle on first album in 15 years. Read MOJO's review and the track listing in full.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2025
The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Joe Muggs 4/5 80 May 21, 2025 “Stereolab always walked a knife edge between deadly serious and dead silly. Their sound was constructed around the sort of reference points – French, German and Brazilian psychedelia, Radiophonic Workshop…”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Alex Hudson 8/10 80 May 27, 2025
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ben Cardew 7.8/10 78 May 22, 2025
The Needle Dropby Anthony Fantano 7/10 70 May 28, 2025 “A very good comeback from Stereolab.”
Northern Transmissionsby Victoria Borlando 6/10 60 May 23, 2025

Instant Holograms on Metal Film in Stereolab's catalog

75Peng! (1992): 6767Transient Random-Noise Bursts with Announcements (1993): 8181Mars Audiac Quintet (1994): 8181Emperor Tomato Ketchup (1996): 8888Dots and Loops (1997): 8181Cobra and Phases Group Play Voltage in the Milky Night (1999): 6666Sound-Dust (2001): 7474Margerine Eclipse (2004): 7474Chemical Chords (2008): 7474Not Music (2010): 7171Instant Holograms on Metal Film (2025): 8181This one1992
Stereolab's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Stereolab album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Stereolab

  • Uncut Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Stereolab's other albums (9).
  • The Guardian Kinder than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 9 points below on Stereolab's other albums (4).
  • Mojo About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Stereolab's other albums (5).
  • AllMusic About usual for them10 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Stereolab's other albums (9).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Stereolab's other albums (10).

More from Stereolab

See all Stereolab albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2025

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply