Critics give Good Morning Spider a B-Side Breakdown of 83 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 93.
The verdict on Good Morning Spider
9 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 93 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 70 Rolling Stone
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Sparklehorse's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Bird Machine (81). The second best-reviewed Indie & Alternative album of 1998 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Marc Weingarten | A | 93 | 1999 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sasha Geffen | 9.1/10 | 91 | 2017 | “Mark Linkous’ second album as Sparklehorse shines an old light on impossible things. He found the purity of pop music and then lacerated it with the quirks and imperfections he…” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Keith Cameron | 9/10 | 90 | 1998 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Spin via Wikipediaby Sara Manaugh | 8/10 | 80 | 1999 | |
| Select via Wikipediaby Steve Lowe | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Adam Sweeting | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Chicago Sun-Times via Wikipediaby Jim DeRogatis | 3/4 | 75 | 1999 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 3.5/5 | 70 | 1999 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Good Morning Spider in Sparklehorse's catalog
How these critics usually treat Sparklehorse
- Pitchfork About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Sparklehorse's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for them8 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Sparklehorse's other albums (4).
More from Sparklehorse
← Earlier Vivadixiesubmarinetransmissionplot (1995)Later → It’s a Wonderful Life (2001)
More Indie & Alternative from around 1998
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply