Critics give Bird Machine a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 75 to 90.
The verdict on Bird Machine
8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 75 Under the Radar
- Career #2 of Sparklehorse's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Sparklehorse's best-reviewed album here since Good Morning Spider (1998).
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4.5/5 | 90 | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 4.2/5 | 84 | 2023 |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Jason Anderson | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby John Amen | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sam Sodomsky | 7.6/10 | 76 | 2023 |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Ian Rushbury | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2023 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Bird Machine in Sparklehorse's catalog
How these critics usually treat Sparklehorse
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual5 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Sparklehorse's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Sparklehorse's other albums (3).
More from Sparklehorse
← Earlier Dreamt for Light Years in the Belly of a Mountain (2006)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply