Early reviews. Critics give Övergivenheten an early B-Side Breakdown of 81 (Keeper), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Övergivenheten
So far, 4 of 4 critics liked it.
- Highest 90 Sonic Perspectives
- Lowest 72 Sputnikmusic
- Career #4 of Soilwork's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Soilwork's best-reviewed album here since Verkligheten (2019).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonic Perspectivesby Jonathan Smith | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2022 | “Superior ambition begets new horizons. The ongoing relationship between the melodic death metal style originally spearheaded by the Gothenburg scene and their younger metalcore cousins on both sides of the…” |
| Metal Temple | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | “I don't know why I bother. It seems the bigger the record company, the less information I am getting when receiving their albums for review. And they don't come much…” |
| Distorted Soundby Graham Ray | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | “Graham Ray reviews the new album from Swedish melodeath veterans Soilwork.” |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Robert Garland | 3.6/5 | 72 | 2022 | “Soilwork – Overgivenheten review: No abandonment here.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Övergivenheten in Soilwork's catalog
How these critics usually treat Soilwork
- Metal Temple Harsher than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Soilwork's other albums (3).
More from Soilwork
More Metal & Punk from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply