Early reviews. Critics give Villa Manifesto an early B-Side Breakdown of 75 (C), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Villa Manifesto
4 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 85 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 60 Spin
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Slum Village's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Slum Village (68).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Nathan Rabin | B | 85 | 2010 | “Slum Village: Villa Manifesto” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby David Amidon | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “As sad as Villa Manifesto's storyline is, this record is also without a doubt the strongest in the group's post-Dilla catalog. Like fellow goofballs De la” |
| RapReviews via Wikipediaby Steve 'Flash' Juon | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | |
| HipHopDX via Wikipediaby Omar Burgess | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Get your hip hop album reviews, rap and R&B reviews from the best music review website on the web. We have all the latest music reviews from today’s top artists.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Nate Patrin | 7.1/10 | 71 | 2010 | “The Detroit crew returns with their first full-length since the deaths of producer J Dilla and founding member Baatin.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jason Lymangrover | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Spin via Wikipediaby Mosi Reeves | 6/10 | 60 | 2010 | “Since the release of their defiantly angsty fifth album in 2005, these Detroit indie hip-hop stalwarts have mourned the passing of founding members J” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Villa Manifesto in Slum Village's catalog
How these critics usually treat Slum Village
- RapReviews About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Slum Village's other albums (3).
More from Slum Village
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply