Dopesmoker

Sleep – Dopesmoker: B-Side Breakdown 84 (B) from 4 critic reviews.

Album cover for Dopesmoker by Sleep
Released April 22, 2003
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sleep

Dopesmoker

84
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 4 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown84Grade: B
Approval75%3 of 4 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Dopesmoker an early B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Dopesmoker

So far, 3 of 4 critics liked it.

020406080100Consequence: 70AllMusic: 80Pitchfork: 85Mojo: 100 Breakdown 84
The gist
Mojo via Wikipedia 5/5 100 2010
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Grayson Haver Currin 8.5/10 85 2012 “Almost 20 years after it was recorded and rejected by London Records and then made public as unofficial bootlegs or unagreeable edits, stoner-rock legends Sleep's storied one-song, hour-long third album…”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2010
Consequence via Wikipediaby Alex Young 3.5/5 70 2012 “The notorious stoner metal opus finally gets its proper release.”

Dopesmoker in Sleep's catalog

75Jerusalem (1996): 8484Dopesmoker (2003): 8484This oneThe Sciences (2018): 8585Hempispheres (2026): 676719962026
Sleep's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Sleep album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Sleep

  • Pitchfork Kinder than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on Sleep's other albums (3).

More from Sleep

See all Sleep albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2003

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply