Critics give No Cities to Love a B-Side Breakdown of 88 (B+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 95.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Sleater-Kinney's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of The Woods (87). All 8 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from The Guardian.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Melissa Maerz | A | 95 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Danette Chavez | A- | 91 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Dan Weiss | 9/10 | 90 | 2015 | “9SPIN Rating: 9 of 10Release Date: January 20, 2015Label: Sub PopThe narrative we try to impose on reunion albums is bullshit. Anyone can be musically” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly | 9/10 | 90 | 2015 | “In 2000, Sleater-Kinney were interviewed on a long-forgotten American teenage TV show called Trackers. As you can see for yourself on YouTube, the hapless host asks spectacularly mundane questions, but…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jenn Pelly | 8.7/10 | 87 | 2015 | “The mighty Sleater-Kinney return a decade after their last album, 2005's The Woods, and they haven't lost a step. No Cities to Love is the band's most front-to-back accessible album,…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's No Cities to Love on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Jenny Stevens | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “The seminal 90s and noughties feminists haven’t lost any of their fire after an eight-year hiatus, writes Jenny Stevens” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Sleater-Kinney
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply