Critics give Path of Wellness a B-Side Breakdown of 70 (Keeper), from 12 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 58 to 80.
The verdict on Path of Wellness
8 of 12 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 Rolling Stone and Exclaim!
- Lowest 58 Beats Per Minute
- By the numbers The lowest score of Sleater-Kinney's 11 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Sleater-Kinney's 'Path of Wellness” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Daniel Sylvester | 8/10 | 80 | 2021 | |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Matthew Berlyant | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2021 | “After the 2019 departure of longtime member Janet Weiss—an absolute monster drummer and fixture on every Sleater-Kinney record since 1997’s breakthrough third album "Dig Me Out"—just a month before the…” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Marc Hirsh | B+ | 75 | 2021 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Zach Schonfeld | 7.3/10 | 73 | 2021 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| XS Noizeby Aaron Kavanagh | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | “Having been inspired by acts such as Bikini Kill and Bratmobile, as well as earlier punk acts like The Slits, X-Ray Spex, and Siouxsie and the Banshees; from” |
| Slantby Jordan Walsh | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | “Carrie Brownstein and Corin Tucker stay on the safer side for most of their 10th album.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | “Sleater-Kinney’s second act has proved to be a chapter of fulfillment. Long regarded as one of the most influential rock bands of their generation,” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sophie Kemp | 6.8/10 | 68 | 2021 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Katie Rife | B | 65 | 2021 | “Sleater-Kinney's Path Of Wellness is paved with guitars” |
| NME via Wikipediaby El Hunt | 3/5 | 60 | 2021 | “The band's first album since drummer Janet Weiss' departure draws on the spiny gloom of their turn-of-the-millennium sound” |
| Beats Per Minuteby John Wohlmacher | 58% | 58 | 2021 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Path of Wellness in Sleater-Kinney's catalog
How these critics usually treat Sleater-Kinney
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on Sleater-Kinney's other albums (8).
- NME About usual for them11 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Sleater-Kinney's other albums (7).
- Pitchfork About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Sleater-Kinney's other albums (10).
- Entertainment Weekly About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Sleater-Kinney's other albums (5).
More from Sleater-Kinney
← Earlier The Center Won’t Hold (2019)Later → Little Rope (2024)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply