Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 88.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Slant) to 88 (Consequence).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | B+ | 88 | 2020 | “Late Brooklyn rapper Pop Smoke welcomes listeners to one final party, Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Gary Suarez | B | 85 | ||
| HipHopDX via Wikipediaby David Aaron Brake | 4.1/5 | 82 | “Get your hip hop album reviews, rap and R&B reviews from the best music review website on the web. We have all the latest music reviews from today’s top artists.” | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “Record is not only a celebration, but an elegy for what else he could have achieved” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Dhruva Balram | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “The Brooklyn drill star's posthumous debut album 'Shoot For The Stars, Aim For The Moon' has been completed with care and attention” |
| Rolling Stone Australia | 4/5 | 80 | “The rapper’s posthumous debut album shows us why he remains the voice of New York City” | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Danny Schwartz | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2020 | “Pop Smoke's summer reign continues with posthumous 'Shoot for the Stars Aim for the Moon' album.” |
| Pitchfork | 6.5/10 | 65 | “The 20-year-old rising star was the voice of Brooklyn drill when he died. On his debut album, executive-produced by 50 Cent, his voice shines through despite a raft of unnecessary…” | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Crone | 2/5 | 40 | ||
| Slant | 2/5 | 40 | “The album has the feel of a B-sides collection culled together as a cash-in on the rapper's death.” |
More from Pop Smoke
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2020
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply