Early reviews. Critics give Perceive Its Beauty, Acknowledge Its Grace an early B-Side Breakdown of 83 (B), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Perceive Its Beauty, Acknowledge Its Grace
7 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 Louder Than War
- Lowest 80 Uncut, Pitchfork, Mojo and 2 more
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louder Than War via Wikipediaby Gordon Rutherford | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2024 | “Gone is the fire and the fury. Shabaka Hutchings has changed scope, now leaning on flutes to craft a much warmer, more organic sound.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Evan Haga | B+ | 88 | 2024 | “On his solo debut, Perceive its Beauty, Acknowledge its Grace, Shabaka sidesteps spiritual-jazz window dressing to deliver soundscapes of intellectual heft.” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison | 8/10 | 80 | 2024 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Hank Shteamer | 8/10 | 80 | 2024 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby John Mulvey | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Sebastian Scotney | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Gal Beckerman’s 2023 book The Quiet Before makes a plea that if ideas, revolutionary or otherwise, are to grow, there needs to be a retreat from “our current cacophony”. And…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4/5 | 80 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Jazz from around 2024
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply