Second Toughest in the Infants

Underworld – Second Toughest in the Infants: B-Side Breakdown 91 (A-) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Second Toughest in the Infants by Underworld
Released March 4, 1996
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Underworld

Second Toughest in the Infants

91 A-Side: the critics' top tier
B-Side BreakdownGrade A- · 8 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown91Grade: A-
Approval100%8 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.

By the numbers: The third best-reviewed album of 1996 we've tracked. All 8 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from NME.

020406080100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 80Uncut: 80NME: 80Entertainment Weekly: 88Select: 100The Guardian: 100Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 100AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 91
The gist
Select via Wikipediaby Andrew Male 5/5 100 2004
The Guardian via Wikipediaby David Bennun 5/5 100 2004
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 5/5 100 2004
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Paul Simpson 5/5 100
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Anya Sacharow B+ 88
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Carla Spartos 4/5 80 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”
Uncut via Wikipediaby Michael Bonner 8/10 80 2004
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2004

More Electronic from around 1996

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply