Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 80.
By the numbers: The lowest score of Underworld's 7 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Daryl Easlea | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “If anything, 2007’s Oblivion With Bells was Underworld’s grown-up album; the cold, metallic feel of Beautiful Burnout and the pensive” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Michaelangelo Matos | C | 75 | 2010 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | ||
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby DiS Archive | 6/10 | 60 | 2010 | “Barking is still a credible effort and a pleasant listen, but it is also unremarkable and, had it been released by artists whose fame didn't preced…” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Ben Weisz | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby John Bush | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andrew Gaerig | 5.9/10 | 59 | 2010 | “The 90s electronic totems have seen their classic work age extremely well, yet oddly struggled to sort out a clear identity in the here and now.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 5/10 | 50 | 2010 | “In the ’90s, everyone loved [a]Underworld[/a] and feared the millennium bug. Hence, it makes odd sense that the band has been misfiring consistently since 1999’s ‘Beaucoup Fish’. With ‘Barking’, they…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Underworld
More Electronic from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply