Enter

Russian Circles – Enter: B-Side Breakdown 75 (Keeper) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Enter by Russian Circles
Released May 16, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Russian Circles

Enter

75
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 3 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown75Keeper
Approval67%2 of 3 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Enter an early B-Side Breakdown of 75 (Keeper), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Enter

So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100Pitchfork: 64AllMusic: 70Drowned in Sound: 90 Breakdown 75
The gist
Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia 9/10 90 2006 “This is an appeal on behalf of us, music fans the world over, to you, post-rocking instrumental acts of no particular intelligence: please, try har…”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek 3.5/5 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jason Crock 6.4/10 64 2006 “Flameshovel band adds sparse, though undeniably seamless, moments of heavy metal grandeur to its mostly math-rock noodling.”

Enter in Russian Circles's catalog

70Enter (2006): 7575This oneStation (2008): 6666Geneva (2009): 8282Empros (2011): 8282Memorial (2013): 8282Guidance (2016): 8181Gnosis (2022): 75752022
Russian Circles's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Russian Circles album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Russian Circles

  • Drowned in Sound Kinder than usual23 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Russian Circles's other albums (3).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual16 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Russian Circles's other albums (6).
  • AllMusic Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Russian Circles's other albums (6).

More from Russian Circles

See all Russian Circles albums ranked

More Rock from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply