Memorial

Russian Circles – Memorial: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Memorial by Russian Circles
Released October 29, 2013
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Russian Circles

Memorial

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 7 critics · 86% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval86%6 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Memorial an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: 6 of 7 critics liked it, with The Line of Best Fit the lone holdout at 65. The fifth best-reviewed Indie & Alternative album of 2013 we've tracked.

020406080100The Line of Best Fit: 65Pitchfork: 78Louder: 80Exclaim!: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 90PopMatters: 100 Breakdown 82
The gist
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Brice Ezell 10/10 100 2013 “Post-metal is at an unfortunate place in its still-young history. Despite an ever-growing sea of bands that bear or are associated with its name,”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Gregory Heaney 4.5/5 90
Louder via Wikipediaby Dayal Patterson 4/5 80 2013
Exclaim! via Wikipedia 8/10 80
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dom Lawson 4/5 80 2013
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brandon Stosuy 7.8/10 78 2013
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby John Skibeat 6.5/10 65 2013 “Their albums don't bite down as hard as they used to, but Russian Circles still wield the ability to compose beautiful, thought-provoking pieces of music.”

More from Russian Circles

See all Russian Circles albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2013

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply