Critics give Keys to the World a B-Side Breakdown of 54 (F), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 20 to 80.
The verdict on Keys to the World
Critics split on this one: 1 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 80 Uncut
- Outlier 20 Pitchfork, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #3 of Richard Ashcroft's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Richard Ashcroft's best-reviewed album here since Human Conditions (2002).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Scott Shetler | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2006 | “Keys to the World demonstrates that Ashcroft is finally hitting his stride as a solo artist.” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | 2006 | “Once upon a time he was a lucky man. Then he turned into an unhappy one. And it seems time has done nothing to change Richard Ashcroft's anguish an…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Michael Lomas | 5/10 | 50 | 2006 | “Self-belief is a strange thing. It's fine and damn convincing when you're on the way to the top. In 1994, Oasis might have been busy telling everyone who” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Peter Relic | 2/5 | 40 | 2005 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 2/5 | 40 | 2006 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 2.0/10 | 20 | 2006 | “Another collection of maudlin strings, chintzy brass, and anguished, bombastic vocals from the once-charismatic Verve singer.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Richard Ashcroft
More Indie & Alternative from around 2006
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply