Critics give Human Conditions a B-Side Breakdown of 58 (F), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 20 to 95.
The verdict on Human Conditions
Critics split on this one: 2 of 9 liked it.
- Highest 95 Entertainment Weekly
- Outlier 20 Drowned in Sound, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #2 of Richard Ashcroft's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- Reputation 30 50 at release, then five or more years later
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | A | 95 | ||
| Spin via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2005 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2021 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 2/5 | 40 | 2002 | |
| Blender via Wikipediaby Andy Pemberton | 2/5 | 40 | 2020 | “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia | 2/10 | 20 | 2002 | “There’s only so many chords you can play. There’s only so much one person can say. Is it really better to burn out than fade away? That is the qu…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Richard Ashcroft
← Earlier Alone with Everybody (2000)Later → Keys to the World (2006)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2002
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply