Critics give Write Me Back a B-Side Breakdown of 70 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 91.
The verdict on Write Me Back
Most critics weren't won over: 4 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 91 Entertainment Weekly
- Outlier 40 Slant, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #5 of R. Kelly's 15 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson | A- | 91 | 2012 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “A soul survivor who still has the power to seduce” |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby August Brown | 3/4 | 75 | 2012 | “R. Kelly's 'Write Me Back” |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3/4 | 75 | 2012 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Miles Marshall Lewis | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: June 26, 2012Label: RCAEven without his recent, more literal throwback moves, R. Kelly had already become retro. Once” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Write Me Back on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jess Harvell | 6.5/10 | 65 | 2012 | “R. Kelly's newest is a collection of soul and R&B throwbacks that doesn't always cut it production-wise but does feature some brilliant singing. And when you're talking R. Kelly albums,…” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Barry Nicolson | 6/10 | 60 | 2012 | “Considering he’s spent most of the past 10 years at the sharp end of the parody stick, it was somehow inevitable that R Kelly would look to recuperate in the…” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Eric Henderson | 2/5 | 40 | 2012 | “Don’t be shocked if this all turns out to be nothing more than a Pied Piper act.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from R. Kelly
More R&B & Soul from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply