Critics give Evil Friends a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 88.
The verdict on Evil Friends
Most critics weren't won over: 4 of 11 liked it.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Ryan Bort | 8.8/10 | 88 | 2013 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Eric Thurm | B | 85 | 2013 | “Portugal. The Man: Evil Friends” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Jordan Blum | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| DIYby Will Richards | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “An album that ebbs and flows, and shines throughout.” |
| Spin via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “ROCKAUSTRA – Olympia7: High-fashion electro-opera pulses and quavers mightily like pre-throat-singing Björk, might stay too icy for own good.—CM BIG DEAL” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Paula Mejia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Sensory-altering, Danger Mouse-produced psychedelic pop.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Mike Powell | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Evil Friends on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Paul Thompson | 6.0/10 | 60 | 2013 | “Seven albums in, the Portland prog-poppers have tidied up their act on Evil Friends, with help from producer Danger Mouse. Portugal. The Man take a surefooted approach here, confidently blasting…” |
| musicOMHby Christopher Monk | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2013 | “Since their formation in 2004, Portland, Oregon-based quintet Portugal. The Man have displayed a level of productivity to rival that of Guided By Voices” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
From B-Side Guys
- More on Portugal. The ManSong Review: Madge – “TALL GRASS” feat. Portugal. The Man
More from Portugal. The Man
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply