Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: The top-rated Pop album of 2017 we've tracked. 6 of 7 critics liked it, with Exclaim! the lone holdout at 70.
| The gist | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipedia | B+ | 88 | “The Engllish singer-songwriter offers up irresistible artifacts in strange, beautiful places.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 8.4/10 | 84 | “Charli XCX’s latest mixtape is a vision of what pop music could be, the sound of an eclectic, hyperreal future where romantic love is fun but fucked and partying is…” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “She wasn’t supposed to make it past 25. Charlotte Aitchison’s Charli XCX persona has never been geared toward longevity. Whether braving an apocalyptic day of reckoning on “Nuclear Seasons” or…” |
| NME via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “The pop star finds freedom in innovation on her second mixtape of 2017” |
| The Guardian via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “With adventurous ideas, noisy thrills and eclectic guests, Charli XCX shows that cheesy pop can be truly creative” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Charli XCX
More Pop from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply