Early reviews. Critics give 22 Dreams an early B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on 22 Dreams
7 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 The Independent
- Lowest 79 Pitchfork
- Career #2 of Paul Weller's 8 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Paul Weller's best-reviewed album here since Wild Wood (1993). The tenth best-reviewed album of 2008 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 5/5 | 100 | 2008 | “Paul Weller's return to Island Records for the first time since 2000's Heliocentric seems like a homecoming of sorts, especially so given the eclectic, engaged nature of his new album.…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Mike Mineo | 8/10 | 80 | ||
| Paste via Wikipediaby Jon Young | 8/10 | 80 | 2008 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Joe Tangari | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2008 | “Simultaneously introducing a host of new ideas and playing like a microcosm of his career and musical life, Weller's latest– among his finest solo records– ranges from crunching rock to…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Paul Weller
More Rock from around 2008
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply