Critics give McCartney a B-Side Breakdown of 70 (Keeper), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 80.
The verdict on McCartney
6 of 11 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 The Independent, Consequence, Blender and AllMusic
- Lowest 50 The Rolling Stone Album Guide
- Career Tied for #11 of Paul McCartney's 24 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independentby Roisin O'Connor | 4/5 | 80 | May 29, 2026 | “Aided by producer wunderkind Andrew Watt, McCartney delivers some of his most personal and introspective songwriting in years, and makes amends for a few recent misfires” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Alex Young | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | “A tweaked revisit to Macca's controversial solo debut.” |
| Blender via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Joe Tangari | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2011 | |
| PopMatters | 7/10 | 70 | Jun 25, 2026 | “Paul McCartney's newest EP, The Boys of Dungeon Lane, uses sound to vividly paint ordinary moments, both real and imagined, into memorable stories” |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | B | 65 | 2004 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Steven Hyden | B | 65 | 2011 | “Paul McCartney: McCartney / McCartney II” |
| Record Collector via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2004 | |
| Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2004 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
McCartney in Paul McCartney's catalog
How these critics usually treat Paul McCartney
- Record Collector Harsher than usual11 points below the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on Paul McCartney's other albums (3).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide Harsher than usual22 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Paul McCartney's other albums (10).
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Paul McCartney's other albums (9).
- The Independent Kinder than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Paul McCartney's other albums (5).
- Robert Christgau Harsher than usual5 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Paul McCartney's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them11 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Paul McCartney's other albums (23).
More from Paul McCartney
More Rock from around 1970
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply