Critics give Dancing Backward in High Heels a B-Side Breakdown of 66 (D), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 20 to 81.
The verdict on Dancing Backward in High Heels
Critics split on this one: scores run from 20 (The Independent) to 81 (The A.V. Club).
- Highest 81 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 20 The Independent
- By the numbers The lowest score of New York Dolls's 4 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Jason Heller | B- | 81 | 2011 | “New York Dolls: Dancing Backward In High Heels” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Barry Walters | 8/10 | 80 | 2011 | “No way the 2006 and 2009 "reunion" albums recorded by the two surviving original Dolls (frontman David Johansen, guitarist Syl Sylvain) could sound, much” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Benjamin Aspray | 8/10 | 80 | ||
| The Telegraph via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Randy Lewis | 3/4 | 75 | 2011 | “This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2011 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Dancing Backward in High Heel on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Tim Chester | 7/10 | 70 | 2011 | “No-one has the right to tell [a]New York Dolls[/a] – even just the two left – when they should call it quits. Yes, six and a bit years on, interest…” |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Chris Jones | 1.5/4 | 38 | Nov 3, 2026 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 1/5 | 20 | 2011 | “There was a certain louche dignity to the Dolls' 2004, but this sorry affair, knocked together in a Newcastle studio with David Johansen and Sylvain Sylvain joined by Blondie guitarist…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from New York Dolls
More Rock from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply