Early reviews. Critics give Honor Found in Decay an early B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Honor Found in Decay
7 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 80 Sputnikmusic, Spin, PopMatters and 3 more
- Lowest 79 Pitchfork
- Career Tied for #3 of Neurosis's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The fifth best-reviewed Metal & Punk album of 2012 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Eli Kleman | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “Neurosis – Honor Found in Decay review: "Honor Found in Decay" sees the band settle into a sweet spot, drawing influences from their vast and legendary discography to create an…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Kory Grow | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: November 06, 2012Label: NeurotNearly three eardrum-decimating decades into their career — and a little more than 15” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Craig Hayes | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Natalie Walschots | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dom Lawson | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “By expressing human frailty with such visceral abandon, Neurosis have once again turned darkness into euphoria, writes Dom Lawson” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Eduardo Rivadavia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Hank Shteamer | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2012 | “Over the course of a 27-year career, the Oakland band has evolved from gritty metallic punk to harrowing post-hardcore prog to the majestic doom of their current phase. Their crushing,…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Honor Found in Decay in Neurosis's catalog
How these critics usually treat Neurosis
- Pitchfork About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Neurosis's other albums (3).
More from Neurosis
← Earlier Given to the Rising (2007)Later → Fires Within Fires (2016)
More Metal & Punk from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply