Critics give Fires Within Fires a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 91.
The verdict on Fires Within Fires
6 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 91 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 70 Exclaim!
- Career Tied for #3 of Neurosis's 4 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby J.J. Anselmi | A- | 91 | 2016 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Sam Shepherd | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2016 | “The release of Neurosis’ 11th album coincides with the band’s 30th anniversary. There’s not many bands that make it that far, and there are even fewer” |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Benjamin Kuettel | 4.0/5 | 80 | 2016 | “Neurosis – Fires Within Fires review: A meditation, a struggle” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Dean Brown | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | “Elemental voyagers Neurosis still shaking the foundations with new album” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jason Heller | 7.1/10 | 71 | 2016 | “The heavy Bay Area band’s eleventh and latest full-length is also their briefest by a sizable margin. It sags often, but Fires With Fires ends with a staggering exhibition of…” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Sarah Kitteringham | 7/10 | 70 | 2016 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Fires Within Fires in Neurosis's catalog
How these critics usually treat Neurosis
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual11 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Neurosis's other albums (3).
More from Neurosis
← Earlier Honor Found in Decay (2012)Later → An Undying Love for a Burning World (2026)
More Metal & Punk from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply