Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: All 6 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from AllMusic. Critics barely disagreed: every score fell between 80 and 88.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Sasha Geffen | B+ | 88 | 2015 | “Alejandro Ghersi digs deeper into body horror and sensuality on his most ambitious work to date.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2015 | “Though his music sometimes exhibits the romantic sweep of chamber music and can be marked with skittering beats, Venezuela-born producer Alejandro Ghersi’s work as Arca is defined above all by…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Colin Joyce | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: November 20, 2015Label: MuteAt the peak of every Arca live show, the Venezuelan producer born Alejandro Ghersi” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rachel Aroesti | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Alejandro Ghersi follows production work for some of leftfield pop’s biggest names with this uncompromising cacophony” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Sam Richards | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Even before the release of his debut album ‘Xen’ last year, Arca (aka Alejandro Ghersi) had already been recruited by FKA Twigs, Kanye West and Björk, becoming the main creative…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Electronic from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply