KiCk i

Arca – KiCk i: B-Side Breakdown 79 (C+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for KiCk i by Arca
Released June 26, 2020
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Arca

KiCk i

79
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 8 critics · 88% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Grade: C+
Approval88%7 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

By the numbers: Arca's best-reviewed album here since Arca (2017). 7 of 8 critics liked it, with The Guardian the lone holdout at 60.

020406080100The Guardian: 60Pitchfork: 75The Line of Best Fit: 75Slant: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80Paste: 88Exclaim!: 90 Breakdown 79
The gist
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Kaelen Bell 9/10 90 2020
Paste via Wikipediaby Max Freedman 8.8/10 88 2020 “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.”
Slant via Wikipediaby Charles Lyons-Burt 4/5 80 2020 “The album is a statement of exuberance from an artist who’s known to deal in gloom.”
NME via Wikipediaby Dhruva Balram 4/5 80 2020 “With an all-star cast including Rosalia and Bjork, this project confirms the Venezuelan artist as a great of the contemporary alternative scene”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Chal Ravens 7.5/10 75 2020 “On the first album of a four-part series, the Venezuelan-born, Barcelona-based artist offers her most accessible music to date, channeling her signature sounds into sharply focused avant-pop.”
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Liam Inscoe-Jones 7.5/10 75 2020 “Arca is finally front centre with her unique and imitable musical blend”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby John Twells 3/5 60 2020

More from Arca

See all Arca albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2020

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply