Early reviews. Critics give Plantation Lullabies an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Plantation Lullabies
6 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 88 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 70 Rolling Stone
- Career #2 of Meshell Ndegeocello's 9 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Marisa Fox | B+ | 88 | 2006 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani | 4/5 | 80 | 2001 | “The album mixes the soul of Sly Stone and the funk of James Brown with the pop sensibilities of Prince and the grace of Lena Horne.” |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Geoff Himes | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3/4 | 75 | 1994 | “Me’Shell NdegeOcello Plantation Lullabies (Maverick) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR) For her bass-playing alone, this 24-year-old newcomer would be worthy of attention. But “Plantation Lullabies” also reveals an artistic vision that,…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2006 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Plantation Lullabies in Meshell Ndegeocello's catalog
How these critics usually treat Meshell Ndegeocello
- AllMusic Harsher than usual1 point above the other critics here. Usually 11 points above on Meshell Ndegeocello's other albums (8).
- Slant Harsher than usual1 point above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Meshell Ndegeocello's other albums (3).
More from Meshell Ndegeocello
More R&B & Soul from around 1993
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply