Early reviews. Critics give Meir an early B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Kvelertak's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Nattesferd (82). The sixth best-reviewed album of 2013 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jason Christopher Monger | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Sam Shepherd | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2013 | “Just as music from Iceland will be forever will be forever compared to Björk or expected to be all spectral like Sigur Rós, so Norwegian bands are” |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Sobhi Youssef | 4.2/5 | 84 | “Kvelertak – Meir review: More everything.” | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Kory Grow | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: March 29, 2013Label: RoadrunnerThe best extreme metal bands want to be electrifying, terrifying, putrefying. Rarely, do” |
| Louder via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Hank Shteamer | 7.2/10 | 72 | 2013 | “The Norwegian band's second album, produced by Converge's Kurt Ballou and featuring cover art from Baroness' John Baizley, is their first for Warner subsidiary Roadrunner.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kvelertak
More Rock from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply