Based on 12 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 91.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 50 (Rolling Stone) to 91 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Simon Vozick-Levinson | A- | 91 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 9/10 | 90 | 2010 | “It’s a merciful relief that, with their second effort in 12 months, The Strange Boys’ ramshackle garage-rock has not so much grown up as merely grown slightly wider. Ryan Sambol’s…” |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Chris Jones | 3.5/4 | 88 | Oct 28, 2026 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Charles Aaron | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: November 09, 2010Label: G.O.O.D./Universal MotownKid Cudi is one fucked-up dude. This is not Web-lurking speculation.” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Michaelangelo Matos | C | 75 | 2010 | “Kid Cudi: Man On The Moon II: The Legend Of Mr. Rager” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Slant | 3.5/5 | 70 | “Pursuing genius at the expense of consistency might work out just fine for Cudi.” | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene | 6.7/10 | 67 | 2010 | “After the two-dimensional art-school-kid clichés of Man on the Moon, kiD CuDi partially makes good on his promise to loosen up his music.” |
| Spectrum Culture | 2.9/5 | 58 | “Kid Cudi Man on the Moon II: The Legend of Mr. Rager Rating: 2.9/5.0 Label: G.O.O.D. Music In a month that has seen the media spotlighting Kanye West and his…” | |
| Beats Per Minute | 55% | 55 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jonah Weiner | 2.5/5 | 50 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kid Cudi
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply