Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 81.
By the numbers: Mac DeMarco's best-reviewed album here since Salad Days (2014). 8 of 9 critics liked it, with Rolling Stone the lone holdout at 60.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Ignatiy Vishnevetsky | B- | 81 | 2017 | “Mac DeMarco embraces dad-rock on This Old Dog” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Q via Wikipediaby Martin Boon | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby James McNair | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Jamie Milton | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Canadian songwriter Mac DeMarco swaps his goofy, fun-guy reputation for some intense soul-searching on album four.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tim Jonze | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Timothy Monger | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2017 | “On his third album, the antics of Mac DeMarco are muted in favor of his impeccable songwriting, which shines through more than ever with warmth and precision.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Our take on the third LP from the indie-rocker.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Mac DeMarco
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply