Critics give Sing to the Moon a B-Side Breakdown of 73 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.
The verdict on Sing to the Moon
Most critics weren't won over: 7 of 9 liked it.
- Outlier 100 The Independent, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 50 NME
- Career #2 of Laura Mvula's 2 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Simon Price | 5/5 | 100 | 2013 | “We've got a special one here.” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “It may be Laura Mvula's fate to be pitched as yet another retro-soul singer, but there's clearly more to her than that, says Alexis Petridis” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jonah Bromwich | 7.4/10 | 74 | 2013 | “This classically trained Brit's debut album has seen her compared to the likes of Nina Simone and David Axelrod. Although her lyrics sometimes communicate an impersonal strain of melancholy, the…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Jessica Hopper | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: May 14, 2013Label: RCA VictorSing to the Moon begins with a florid blossom of vocal harmonies, of many Laura Mvulas,” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Caryn Ganz | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Sing to the Moon on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Lucy Jones | 5/10 | 50 | 2013 | “Birmingham’s Laura Mvula arrives already richly adorned with praise. Nominated for both the Critics’ Choice Award at the Brits and the Sound Of 2013, she’s on a carefully plotted course…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Laura Mvula
More R&B & Soul from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply