Critics give Pink Noise a B-Side Breakdown of 90 (A-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.
The verdict on Pink Noise
8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 The Arts Desk and DIY
- Lowest 80 NME and The Independent
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of 2021 we've tracked. The best-reviewed album of Laura Mvula's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Sing to the Moon (73).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Peter Quinn | 5/5 | 100 | 2021 | “Album number three from Ivor Novello-winning singer-songwriter Laura Mvula sees her paying singularly personal homage to the music of the 1980s.” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Sean Kerwick | 5/5 | 100 | 2021 | “A career-defining return that most artists can only dream of; pure synth-pop ecstasy.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Marcus J. Moore | A- | 91 | 2021 | |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby David Cobbald | 9/10 | 90 | 2021 | “Pink Noise is the righteously groove-laden emancipation of Laura Mvula” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Emma Harrison | 9/10 | 90 | 2021 | “Ivor Novello award-winning musician Laura Mvula is embracing the colourful decade of the 80s with her new album ‘Pink Noise’. Five years on” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2021 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Nick Levine | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “The meandering nature of Mvula’s song structures can leave you grasping for more melody, but the moods she creates are always clearly defined” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Laura Mvula
More R&B & Soul from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply