Early reviews. Critics give Paradises an early B-Side Breakdown of 69 (D+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Paradises
Most critics weren't won over: 2 of 7 liked it.
- Highest 80 Under the Radar and Uncut
- Lowest 60 Mojo, musicOMH and The Arts Desk
- Career Tied for #7 of Ladytron's 9 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Ladytron's best-reviewed album here since Time’s Arrow (2023).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Jimi Arundell | 8/10 | 80 | Mar 20, 2026 | |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Daniel Dylan Wray | 8/10 | 80 | 2020 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jesse Dorris | 7.0/10 | 70 | Apr 2, 2026 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2020 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Roy Wilkinson | 3/5 | 60 | 2020 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy | 3/5 | 60 | Mar 20, 2026 | “A lean masterpiece lurks in Paradises, a record that holds rewards for the patient listener. But it cries out for a judicious pair of editing scissors” |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Thomas H. Green | 3/5 | 60 | Mar 14, 2026 | “The best of Ladytron should be on everyone’s playlists. Over 27 years, the Liverpudlian synth-pop act have established themselves as a well-loved international cult act. They’re heading for (underground) heritage…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Paradises in Ladytron's catalog
How these critics usually treat Ladytron
- musicOMH Harsher than usual10 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Ladytron's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Ladytron's other albums (8).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Ladytron's other albums (7).
More from Ladytron
More Electronic from around 2026
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply