Critics give Wanderland a B-Side Breakdown of 66 (D), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 30 to 81.
The verdict on Wanderland
Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 8 liked it.
- Highest 81 Entertainment Weekly
- Outlier 30 The Rolling Stone Album Guide, 30 points below the next-lowest score
- Career Tied for #5 of Kelis's 6 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Mark Bautz | B- | 81 | 2002 | |
| Blender via Wikipediaby Rupert Howe | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2001 | “Kelis has always been R&B's most disconcerting diva – and Wanderland isn't about to change that, says Alexis Petridis.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Barry Walters | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2002 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani | 3/5 | 60 | 2002 | “Wanderland ultimately sounds more like home to the Neptunes than Kelis.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Stephen Dalton | 6/10 | 60 | 2005 | “Ol’ Dirty Bastard calls her Thunder Bitch. Broadsheet newspapers proclaim her the brightest new flame in feminist hip-pop. Smitten old men twice her age invite her out on globe-trotting dates…” |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Ernest Hardy | 1.5/5 | 30 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kelis
More R&B & Soul from around 2001
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply