Early reviews. Critics give Blue Water Road an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Blue Water Road
6 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 The Line of Best Fit
- Lowest 79 Pitchfork
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Kehlani's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of While We Wait (79).
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Sophia Simon-Bashall | 9/10 | 90 | 2022 |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Shahzaib Hussain | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Kadish Morris | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Dylan Green | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2022 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Blue Water Road in Kehlani's catalog
How these critics usually treat Kehlani
- Clash About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Kehlani's other albums (3).
- The Line of Best Fit About usual for them10 points above the other critics here. Usually 13 points above on Kehlani's other albums (4).
- NME About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Kehlani's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Kehlani's other albums (5).
More from Kehlani
← Earlier It Was Good Until It Wasn’t (2020)Later → Crash (2024)
More R&B & Soul from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply