Critics give Beautifully Human: Words and Sounds Vol. 2 a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 88.
The verdict on Beautifully Human: Words and Sounds Vol. 2
9 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 88 Los Angeles Times
- Lowest 80 Vibe, Uncut, Q and 3 more
- Career #2 of Jill Scott's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Jill Scott's best-reviewed album here since Who Is Jill Scott? Words and Sounds Vol. 1 (2000). The top-rated R&B & Soul album of 2004 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Robert Hilburn | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2004 | “Gifted as vocalist and writer, Jill Scott makes music that recalls past masters of R&B; yet is wholly her own.” |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | A- | 85 | 2004 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Raymond Fiore | A- | 85 | 2004 | |
| Vibe via Wikipediaby Letisha Marrero | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2006 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4/5 | 80 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Beautifully Human: Words and Sounds Vol. 2 in Jill Scott's catalog
How these critics usually treat Jill Scott
- AllMusic Harsher than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Jill Scott's other albums (4).
- The Guardian About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Jill Scott's other albums (3).
More from Jill Scott
← Earlier Who Is Jill Scott? Words and Sounds Vol. 1 (2000)Later → The Real Thing: Words and Sounds Vol. 3 (2007)
More R&B & Soul from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply