Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 88.
By the numbers: Yeah Yeah Yeahs's best-reviewed album here since Fever to Tell (2003). All 9 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from AllMusic.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Mikael Wood | 3.5/4 | 88 | “Los Angeles Times blogs that were published between 2006 and 2013.” | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Simon Vozick-Levinson | B+ | 88 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Joshua Love | 8.1/10 | 81 | 2009 | “YYYs make the dreaded "mature album" work by taking familiar shapes and tools and recombining them in ways that are bracing and unexpected.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | “Check out our album review of Artist's It's Blitz! on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 8/10 | 80 | 2009 | “Facts about this album: * Yeah Yeah Yeahs are Karen O, Nick Zinner and Brian Chase. * Their third album, ‘It’s Blitz’ was recorded partly in a snow-bound barn in…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | “The band's glittery new disco sound suits them very well. It's all cool, brittle catchiness, writes Caroline Sullivan” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby John Doran | 8/10 | 80 | 2009 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Bernadette McNulty | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Yeah Yeah Yeahs
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply