Ironman

Ghostface Killah – Ironman: B-Side Breakdown 90 (A-) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Ironman by Ghostface Killah
Released October 29, 1996
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Ghostface Killah

Ironman

90 A-Side: the critics' top tier
B-Side BreakdownGrade A- · 6 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown90Grade: A-
Approval100%6 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 8 points of each other

An early A-Side. It earned the badge from its first 6 reviews. More outlets are still weighing in, and if their scores pull it below the line, the badge comes off.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Ghostface Killah's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Supreme Clientele (83). The sixth best-reviewed album of 1996 we've tracked.

020406080100RapReviews: 85Los Angeles Times: 88Entertainment Weekly: 88AllMusic: 90Pitchfork: 94Robert Christgau: 95 Breakdown 90
Robert Christgau via Wikipedia A 95
Pitchfork 9.4/10 94 2022
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B+ 88
RapReviews 8.5/10 85 2024

More from Ghostface Killah

See all Ghostface Killah albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 1996

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply