Critics give 36 Seasons a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on 36 Seasons
5 of 8 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 91 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 60 Pitchfork
- Career #9 of Ghostface Killah's 13 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The fourth best-reviewed Hip-Hop & Rap album of 2014 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | A- | 91 | 2014 | |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Michael Madden | B | 85 | 2014 | “The Wu-Tang Clan member and consummate artist drops a complete album, both lyrically and musically.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Josh Spiegel | C+ | 78 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Theon Weber | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: December 09, 2014Label: Tommy BoyAbout halfway through 36 Seasons, Ghostface Killah gets his face burned off in a crack” |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby August Brown | 2.5/4 | 63 | 2014 | “It's a bold move for a member of the Wu-Tang Clan to name a solo album after "36" of anything.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 6.0/10 | 60 | 2014 | “Following in the footsteps of 2013’s Twelve Reasons to Die, Ghostface Killah’s new album tells the story of Tony Starks’ revenge on his enemies. Like that earlier record, it plays…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Ghostface Killah
← Earlier Twelve Reasons to Die (2013)Later → Twelve Reasons to Die II (2015)
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply