Critics give The Creek Drank the Cradle a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on The Creek Drank the Cradle
7 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 Tiny Mix Tapes and AllMusic
- Outlier 60 Q, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Iron & Wine's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Our Endless Numbered Days (81).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Tyler Martin | B+ | 88 | 2003 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ryan Kearney | 8.1/10 | 81 | 2002 | “I sometimes wonder if musicians like Samuel Beam (aka Iron & Wine), envy contemporary "artists" such as Britney Spears or Linkin …” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Neil Robertson | 8/10 | 80 | 2003 | “Sam Beam is a cheat. As his half hung-over voice wraps itself around album closer 'Muddy Hymnal', guitars slide and strum and waltz with all the wo…” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Creek Drank the Cradle in Iron & Wine's catalog
How these critics usually treat Iron & Wine
- Pitchfork About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Iron & Wine's other albums (6).
- AllMusic About usual for them10 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Iron & Wine's other albums (7).
- Mojo About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Iron & Wine's other albums (3).
- Uncut About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Iron & Wine's other albums (4).
More from Iron & Wine
More Indie & Alternative from around 2002
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply