Critics give Love Letter for Fire a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 90.
The verdict on Love Letter for Fire
7 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 PopMatters
- Lowest 70 musicOMH
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Iron & Wine's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of The Creek Drank the Cradle (81).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Emmanuel Elone | 9/10 | 90 | 2016 | “As soon as it was announced that Iron & Wine’s very own Sam Beam was to team up with Sub Pop label mate Jesca Hoop for a collaborative album, expectations” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Eric Swedlund | B+ | 88 | 2022 | |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Jonathan K Dick | B | 85 | 2016 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Harriet Gibsone | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Lee Zimmerman | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2016 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Allison Hussey | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2016 | “This slow-burning collaborative album from Jesca Hoop and Iron & Wine's Sam Beam recalls healing summer storms more than destructive blazes.” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Chris White | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2016 | “Sam Beam, better known as Iron and Wine, started off his career shortly after the turn of the millennium as a quintessential solo artist. Debut album The” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Love Letter for Fire in Iron & Wine's catalog
How these critics usually treat Iron & Wine
- AllMusic Harsher than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Iron & Wine's other albums (7).
- Pitchfork About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Iron & Wine's other albums (6).
More from Iron & Wine
More Indie & Alternative from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply