Critics give Life Love Flesh Blood a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on Life Love Flesh Blood
5 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 60 Spectrum Culture, Uncut, Mojo and The Guardian
- Career #2 of Imelda May's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Imelda May's best-reviewed album here since Mayhem (2010).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Paste via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Also Ulver, The New Pornographers, and Timber Timbre” |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Liz Thomson | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “As Imelda May releases her fifth CD, it can’t but help that Bob Dylan has come out as a fan – it was, she wrote, "like being kissed by Apollo…” |
| Spectrum Culture via Wikipediaby Michael Campochiaro | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Features May doing what she does best with that inimitable voice.” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Ben Beaumont-Thomas | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Life Love Flesh Blood in Imelda May's catalog
More from Imelda May
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply