Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 85.
By the numbers: The lowest score of Goldfrapp's 6 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt | B | 85 | ||
| Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Head First is a brief trip, but it’s saturated with enough hi-NRG motifs and sounds for countless sweaty workouts at Jack LaLanne.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 6.6/10 | 66 | 2010 | “Bringing roller-disco synth-pop out of mothballs gives the UK duo their most entertaining album since electro-glam juggernaut Supernature.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 6/10 | 60 | 2010 | “Whether they know it or not, many of this generation’s most magnetic pop artists are in hock to Alison Goldfrapp. [a]Lily Allen[/a], [a]La Roux[/a], [a]Little Boots[/a]… all owe the frizz-haired…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | “Goldfrapp has gone straight down the middle of the road for her latest. Alexis Petridis gets tired of the view” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | “Having leapt feet-first on 2008's Seventh Tree into the spooky wyrd-folk world then being opened up by the likes of Bat For Lashes, Goldfrapp now suddenly effect a complete volte-face…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 2.5/5 | 50 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Goldfrapp
More Pop from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply