Early reviews. Critics give Pure an early B-Side Breakdown of 47 (F), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Pure
Critics split on this one: scores run from 20 (NME and 1 other) to 60 (Q and 3 others).
- Highest 60 Q, Select, The Guardian and AllMusic
- Lowest 20 NME and Drowned in Sound
- Reputation 40 50 at release, then five or more years later
- By the numbers The lowest score of Gary Numan's 6 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Select via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa | 3/5 | 60 | 2000 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Liana Jonas | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Noel Gardner | 2/10 | 20 | 2005 | “He may have been roundly mocked by the populace in his alleged halcyon days for being a Tory, a fifth-rate Bowie impersonator, and having difficulty landing his plane, but squat…” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Graham Reed | 2/10 | 20 | 2000 | “It’s a sad state of affairs when an innovator starts copying the bands he influenced so highly. Twenty years from his emergence with the boundary c…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Pure in Gary Numan's catalog
How these critics usually treat Gary Numan
- AllMusic About usual for them16 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Gary Numan's other albums (4).
More from Gary Numan
← Earlier Telekon (1980)Later → Splinter – Songs from a Broken Mind (2013)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2000
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply