Dog in the Sand

Frank Black and the Catholics – Dog in the Sand: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Dog in the Sand by Frank Black and the Catholics
Released 2000
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Frank Black and the Catholics

Dog in the Sand

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 8 critics · 63% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval63%5 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Dog in the Sand a B-Side Breakdown of 73 (C), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 88.

The verdict on Dog in the Sand

5 of 8 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 60NME: 60Alternative Press: 60Pitchfork: 78Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 80Mojo: 80AllMusic: 80The A.V. Club: 88 Breakdown 73
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Keith Phipps B+ 88 2001 “Frank Black And The Catholics: Dog In The Sand”
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 4/5 80 2005
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80 2005
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby D. Erik Kempke 7.8/10 78 2001 “Somewhere along the line, Frank Black decided to abandon the idea of being a "major" artist who makes "major" artistic …”
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Douglas Wolk 3/5 60 2004 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”
NME via Wikipedia 6/10 60 2005 “It’s unfortunate that Frank Black And The Catholics’ fourth release falls so close to that of his former band the Pixies’ B-sides compilation. Next to the twisted urgency of Black’s…”
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 6/10 60 2005

Dog in the Sand in Frank Black and the Catholics's catalog

75Frank Black and the Catholics (1998): 5858Pistolero (1999): 6060Dog in the Sand (2000): 7373This oneBlack Letter Days (2002): 6060Devil’s Workshop (2002): 5656Show Me Your Tears (2003): 656519982003
Frank Black and the Catholics's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Frank Black and the Catholics album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Frank Black and the Catholics

  • Alternative Press Harsher than usual15 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Frank Black and the Catholics's other albums (3).
  • The Rolling Stone Album Guide Harsher than usual15 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Frank Black and the Catholics's other albums (5).
  • Encyclopedia of Popular Music About usual for them8 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Frank Black and the Catholics's other albums (5).
  • AllMusic About usual for them8 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Frank Black and the Catholics's other albums (5).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Frank Black and the Catholics's other albums (5).

More from Frank Black and the Catholics

See all Frank Black and the Catholics albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2000

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply